Developing an AI-Enhanced Enterprise Architecture Model for Strategic Decision-Making in Malaysia’s Railway Industry

Authors

  • Mailasan Jayakrishnan Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Melaka, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-1621
  • Nor Fatiha Subri Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Perak, Malaysia
  • Lyana Izzati Mohd Asri Department of Information Systems, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Perak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v10i2.1170

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Enterprise Architecture, Information System, Performance Indicator, Railway Industry, Supplier Performance

Abstract

Most developing nations, including Malaysia, still lack a model for the decision-making process that is comprehensive enough to account for a wide variety of potential effects and failures. The implementation of this investigation is crucial for Enterprise Architecture (EA) parameters for Railway Industry (RI) supplier performance that emphasize strategic decision-making processes to help the organizations become more competitive. In response to this need, the research integrates Artificial Intelligence (AI) as an enabler within the EA model to support intelligent and data-driven decision-making. This research has implemented a strategic decision-making process in the RI context and conducted it from a developing country perspective. The study identifies several elements of the decision-making process faced and experienced by the RI and the potential gaps for further observations in adopting the EA model. As a result, a fresh conceptual model enhanced with AI-driven analytics and intelligent decision support was created and assessed. By fulfilling the aims of the study, this research makes important contributions to the RI in terms of the use of EA, aligned with the worldwide standard of the four fundamental EA criteria, and explores the transformative potential of AI integration to accelerate EA adoption. The study's findings will impact both theory and practice, providing a pathway for developing nations to harness AI for strategic advantage and digital maturity.

References

[1] S. Pathak, V. Krishnaswamy, and M. Sharma, “A dynamic capability perspective on the impact of big data analytics and enterprise architecture on innovation: an empirical study,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 532–563, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-01-2024-0059.

[2] Y. I. Alzoubi and A. Mishra, “Enterprise architecture contribution in distributed agile software development,” Syst. Eng., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 570–584, May 2024, doi: 10.1002/sys.21739.

[3] M. Jayakrishnan, A. K. Mohamad, and M. M. Yusof, “A Model-Driven IS 4 . 0 Development Framework for Railway Supply Chain,” J. Online Inform., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 258–265, 2022, doi: 10.15575/join.v7i2.794.

[4] N. A. A. Bakar, A. H. Suib, A. Othman, A. A. Amdan, M. A. A. Hassan, and S. S. Hussein, “Artificial Intelligence in Enterprise Architecture: Innovations, Integration Challenges, and Ethics,” 2024, pp. 578–588. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-589-8_54.

[5] M. Jayakrishnan, A. K. Mohamad, and M. M. Yusof, “Journey of an Information System in Railway Industry development approach through an enterprise framework,” Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2023, doi: 10.1556/1848.2021.00408.

[6] S. Kaggwa, T. F. Eleogu, F. Okonkwo, O. A. Farayola, P. U. Uwaoma, and A. Akinoso, “AI in Decision Making: Transforming Business Strategies,” Int. J. Res. Sci. Innov., vol. X, no. XII, pp. 423–444, 2024, doi: 10.51244/IJRSI.2023.1012032.

[7] T. Tamm, P. B. Seddon, and G. Shanks, “How enterprise architecture leads to organisational benefits,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 67, p. 102554, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102554.

[8] R. F. Calhau, J. P. A. Almeida, S. Kokkula, and G. Guizzardi, “Modeling competences in enterprise architecture: from knowledge, skills, and attitudes to organizational capabilities,” Softw. Syst. Model., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 559–598, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10270-024-01151-7.

[9] S. Kotusev and A. Alwadain, “Modeling Business Capabilities in Enterprise Architecture Practice: The Case of Business Capability Models,” Inf. Syst. Manag., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 201–223, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1080/10580530.2023.2231635.

[10] E. Atencio, M. Mancini, and G. Bustos, “Enterprise architecture approach for project-based organizations modeling, design, and analysis: An ontology-driven tool proposal,” Alexandria Eng. J., vol. 98, pp. 312–327, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.04.052.

[11] A. K. Mohamad, M. Jayakrishnan, and M. M. Yusof, “Thriving information system through business intelligence knowledge management excellence framework,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 506–514, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v12i1.pp506-514.

[12] H. Alghamdi, “Assessing the Impact of Enterprise Architecture on Digital Transformation Success: A Global Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, p. 8865, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16208865.

[13] R. F. Calhau, C. L. B. Azevedo, and J. P. A. Almeida, “Towards Ontology-based Competence Modeling in Enterprise Architecture,” in 2021 IEEE 25th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), IEEE, Oct. 2021, pp. 71–81. doi: 10.1109/EDOC52215.2021.00018.

[14] A. W. Qurashi, Z. A. Farhat, V. Holmes, and A. P. Johnson, “New Avenues for Automated Railway Safety Information Processing in Enterprise Architecture: An NLP Approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 44413–44424, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3272610.

[15] M. Jayakrishnan, A. Karim, and M. Mohd, “Railway supply chain excellence through the mediator role of business intelligence : Knowledge management approach towards information system,” Uncertain Supply Chain Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 125–136, 2022, doi: 10.5267/j.uscm.2021.10.003.

[16] N. R. Busch and A. Zalewski, “A Systematic Literature Review of Enterprise Architecture Evaluation Methods,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1–36, May 2025, doi: 10.1145/3706582.

[17] J. Li, H. Cao, L. Lin, Y. Hou, R. Zhu, and A. El Ali, “User Experience Design Professionals’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence,” in Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA: ACM, May 2024, pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3642114.

[18] M. Jayakrishnan, A. K. Mohamad, and M. M. Yusof, “Developing railway supplier selection excellence using business intelligence knowledge management framework,” Int. Rev. Appl. Sci. Eng., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 257–268, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1556/1848.2021.00267.

[19] D. M. Khairina, P. Purwanto, and D. M. Kusumo Nugraheni, “Systematic literature review on evaluation models and methods in enterprise architecture research,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 2851–2864, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.11591/eei.v13i4.6943.

[20] Z. Zong and Y. Guan, “AI-Driven Intelligent Data Analytics and Predictive Analysis in Industry 4.0: Transforming Knowledge, Innovation, and Efficiency,” J. Knowl. Econ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 864–903, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-02001-z.

[21] MIGHT, Malaysian Rail Supporting Industry Roadmap 2030. 2024.

[22] M. Jayakrishnan, A. K. Mohamad, and M. M. Yusof, “Business Architecture Model in Strategic Information System Management for Effective Railway Supply Chain Perspective,” Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3927–3933, 2020.

[23] D. Syamsunur et al., “MASS RAPID TRANSIT (MRT) DEMAND AND CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR RAIL TRANSPORT IN MALAYSIA,” Indones. J. Constr. Eng. Sustain. Dev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 7–21, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.25105/cesd.v7i1.20230.

[24] A. N. H. Ibrahim, M. N. Borhan, M. R. Mat Yazid, R. A. Rahmat, and S. Yukawa, “Factors Influencing Passengers’ Satisfaction with the Light Rail Transit Service in Alpha Cities: Evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Using Structural Equation Modelling,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 16, p. 1954, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9161954.

[25] I. Landscape and W. H. List, “Industrial landscape,” 2024.

[26] W. Omar, “Transformation Plan 2015-2020,” Dep. Stat. Malaysia, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 79, 2017, [Online]. Available: www.statistics.gov.my

[27] M. Jayakrishnan, A. K. Mohamad, and A. Abdullah, “The Taxonomy of Enterprise Architecture towards High Technology High Value Approach In Malaysian Transportation Industry,” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol., vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 351–368, 2018, [Online]. Available: http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp

Downloads

Published

2025-10-25

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Article

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Mailasan Jayakrishnan, Nor Fatiha Subri, Lyana Izzati Mohd Asri

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

 

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Most read articles by the same author(s)