Reactive Forwarding and Proactive Forwarding Performance Comparison on SDN-Based Network

Authors

  • Galura Muhammad Suranegara Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-8825
  • Ichwan Nul Ichsan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Endah Setyowati Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v5i1.382

Keywords:

Open network operating system, Proactive forwarding, Reactive forwarding, Software-defined networking

Abstract

Software-defined networking (SDN) technology is one key technology in telecommunications networks that are currently widely studied. In SDN-based networks, the controller holds the key to the reliability of a network because all control functions are held by the controller as one of the open-source controllers, the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) has two forwarding mechanisms, namely reactive forwarding, and proactive forwarding. This study compares performance between reactive forwarding and proactive forwarding on ONOS with VM migration as traffic. The parameter measured is the total migration time using simple network topology. From the test results, the proactive forwarding scenario can optimize the fastest potential of the topology tested by using the path that has the largest bandwidth available on the network topology. In comparison, reactive forwarding can only pass through the smallest hops of the tested topology. From the measurement results, the average migration time performance using a proactive forwarding scenario is 36.16% faster than the reactive forwarding scenario.

Author Biographies

Galura Muhammad Suranegara, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Program Studi Sistem Telekomunikasi

Ichwan Nul Ichsan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Program Studi Sistem Telekomunikasi

Endah Setyowati, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Program Studi Sistem Telekomunikasi

References

Kernel Virtual Machine Documentation, URL: https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Documents (January 2020)

Suranegara, G. M., Marenda, D. A., Hakimi, R., Risdianto, A. C., & Mulyana, E. (2018). Design and Implementation of VM Migration Application on SDN-Based Network. Proceeding of 2018 4th International Conference on Wireless and Telematics, ICWT 2018, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICWT.2018.8527782

SDN Architecture Overview White Paper, ONF. URL: https://www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/sdn-resources/technical-reports/TR-521_SDN_Architecture_issue_1.1.pdf, (January 2020)

ONOS, User Documentation Guide, ONOS. URL: https://wiki.onosproject.org, (January 2020)

Mininet Documentation, Mininet. URL: http://docs.mininet.org, (January 2020)

Singh, H., Next-Gen Virtualization, VMWare, URL: https://www.vmware.com/topics/glossary/content/virtual-machine, (January 2020)

Finucane, S. “Why OpenvSwitch?â€. URL: https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/blob/master/Documentation/intro/why-ovs.rst, (January 2020)

“QEMU version 2.12.0 User Documentation,†URL: https://qemu.weilnetz.de/doc/qemu-doc.html, (January 2020)

Shah, Amit. “Kernel-based virtualization with KVMâ€. Deep Virtue, issue 86, pp 37-39. January 2008.

W.D. Ashley, D. Berrange, C. Lalancette, et.al. “Libvirt Application Development Guide Using Pythonâ€. Version 1.1, 29 May 2001.

VMWare, “Cold Migration,†vSphere 5 Documentation Center. URL: https://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/index.jsp, (January 2020)

Veritas, “Overview of a Warm Migration,†Oracle VM Server for SPARC Guest Domain Migration. URL: https://sort.veritas.com/ public/documents, (January 2020)

U. Lublin, Q.A. Liguori, IBM. “KVM Live Migration,†KVM Forum, 2007

Mininet Pythion API Reference Manual, URL: http://mininet.org/api/classmininet_1_1link_1_1TCIntf.html, (January 2020)

ONOS SDN-API Reactive Routing, URL: https://wiki.onosproject.org/display/ONOS/SDN-IP+Reactive+Routing, (January 2020)

Downloads

Published

2020-07-16

Issue

Section

Article

Citation Check