Reducing Free Riding Behaviour in Collaborative Work with Computer Supported Tools

Authors

  • Wieger Kloppenburg University of Twente
  • Eva Nurlatifah University of Twente, Netherlands
  • Christian Spijkerboer University of Twente
  • Fitri Almira Yasmin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15575/join.v3i1.180

Keywords:

collaborative work, computer supported tools, free ride, social loafing, computer supported collaborative work

Abstract

Free riding behaviour is a problem that has been around for many years. With all the new technological advances, there is much more collaborative work supported by online tools. These developments make it easier for individuals to become a free rider. This research carried out a literature study, to find the best method to reduce free-riding behaviour. Besides the methods, this study also elaborates some factors that trigger free riders in a group. The methods which are highlighted in this research are the implementation of assessments, group awareness tools, sufficient group size and enhancing team morale. However, the study found that none of the methods cover all the aspects of free-riding behaviour. It is suggested by this research to combine and improve various methods, to a new method that can effectively reduce free-riding behaviour in collaborative work with computer-supported tools.

References

R. Albanese, D. D. Van Fleet, R. Albanese, and D. D. V. A. N. Fleet, “Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Rational Behavior in Groups: The Free Riding Tendency1,” vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 244–255, 1985.

J. Suleiman and R. T. Watson, “Social loafing in technology-supported teams,” Comput. Support. Coop. Work, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 291–309, 2008.

B. Mullen, “Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective,” J. Exp. Soc. Psychol., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 295–322, 1983.

S. L. Piezon and R. L. Donaldson, “Online Groups and Social Loafing: Understanding Student-Group Interactions,” Online J. Distance Learn. Adm., vol. 8, no. 4, 2005.

Steiner, Group Processes and Group Productivity, Academic. New York, 1972.

B. Nonnecke and J. Preece, Silent Participants: Getting to Know Lurkers Better. London: Springer, 2003.

J. MacDonald, “Assessing online collaborative learning: Process and product,” Comput. Educ., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 377–391, 2003.

O. A. Alnuaimi, L. P. Robert, and L. M. Maruping, “Team Size, Dispersion, and Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Teams: A Perspective on the Theory of Moral Disengagement,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 203–230, 2010.

E. F. McDonough III, K. B. K. B. Kahn, G. Barczak, and E. F. McDonough, “An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 18, pp. 110–120, 2001.

R. Postmes and T. Spears, “Deindividuation and anti-normative behaviour: A meta-analysis,” Psychol. Bull., no. 123, pp. 238–259, 1998.

A. H. Van de and A. L. Delbecq, “The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 605–621, 1974.

S. W.-D. work and undefined 2002, “Maintaining awareness in distributed team collaboration: Implications for leadership and performance,” books.google.com.

L. Chidambaram and L. L. Tung, “Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 149–168, 2005.

S. Karau and K. Williams, “Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 134–140, 1995.

S. Piezon, “Social loafing and free riding in online learning groups,” 2011.

N. Kerr, “Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis,” psycnet.apa.org, 1983.

M. Hütter and M. Diehl, “Motivation losses in teamwork: The effects of team diversity and equity sensitivity on reactions to Free-Riding,” Gr. Process. Intergr. Relations, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 845–856, 2011.

J. Shepperd, “Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis,” psycnet.apa.org, 1993.

S. L. Piezon, “THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION By JOI PHELPS WALKER A Dissertation submitted to the School of Teacher Education in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011,” 2011.

J. He, “Counteracting Free-Riding With Team Morale -An Experimental Study,” J. Internet Bank. Commer., vol. 17, no. 1, 2012.

N. Cooke, E. Salas, P. Kiekel, ... “Advances in measuring team cognition,” cerici.org, 2004.

N.-F. Liu and D. Carless, “Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 279–290, Jul. 2006.

C. M. Brooks and J. L. Ammons, “Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments,” J. Educ. Bus., vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 268–272, 2003.

V. U. Druskat and S. B. Wolff, “Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups,” psycnet.apa.org, vol. 84, 1999.

B. L. Smith and J. T. MacGregor, “What is collaborative learning?” Collab. Learn. A Sourceb. High. Educ., no. 1, pp. 10–30, 1992.

S. G. Harkins, “Social loafing and social facilitation,” J. Exp. Soc., 1987.

R. Lu, “Anonymity in collaboration: anonymous vs. identifiable e-peer review in writing instruction,” 2011.

R. Swaray, “An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 285–292, 2012.

J. Brindley, L. Blaschke, and C. Walti, “Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment,” irrodl.org, 2009.

C. Gutwin and S. Greenberg, “A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware,” Comput. Support. Coop. Work, vol. 11, no. 3–4, pp. 411–446, Sep. 2002.

J. Janssen and D. Bodemer, “Coordinated Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Awareness and Awareness Tools,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 40–55, 2013.

J. Hackman, “Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances,” 2002.

O. Grusky, “Managerial Succession and Organizational Effectiveness,” Am. J. Sociol., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 21–31, Jul. 1963.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Article

Citation Check

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Online Informatika

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

 

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

  • NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License